AnnoBib -- “Meaning in Context: Is There any Other Kind?”
Mishler, Elliot. “Meaning in Context: Is There any Other Kind?” Harvard Educational Review 49.1 (February 1979): 1-19. Print.
Discusses the limitations of the scientific model for some study and discussion; though positivism and the scientific model can work for the natural and biological sciences, the fact that results in “ecological psychology” fields, such as education, are difficult to duplicate and generalize in different contexts indicate that other methods are needed. Defines and explains the usefulness of phenomenology, sociolinguistics, and ethnomethodology. Mishler shows phenomenology as the perspective of observer intertwined with the phenomenon, with multiple truths that shift with perspective, method, or purpose (9, 10). Sociolinguistics emphasizes syntax and pragmatics functioning on intent and meaning (12), though studies show context judgments are often subjective. Ethnomethodology sees a relationship between actors and rules and “reflexive” production (15). Mishler is critical of any dogmatic empiricism being forced as the only method of study in human interactions, but recognizes both the scientific process as necessary in some sciences while hopeful and encouraging of these three methodologies in especially pedagogical study. His explanation of phenomenology and sociolinguistics are particularly useful, combining skill sets from training in psychology and language.